Entry fee, royalty, mandated suppliers and the economics of both paths on the same 100 m².
7 min read · Updated 2026-09-05
Gives: a tested menu and processes, supply chain, brand awareness, a fast opening ramp, training. Takes: an entry fee of ₺1-3 million, 5-8% of sales as royalty plus 1-3% marketing fund, mandated suppliers (often expensive), a fit-out standard (sometimes with their contractor), limited control over menu and prices.
Freedom, full margin, your own suppliers; in return a learning curve, time to be discovered (a 12-month ramp) and all the risk on you. Most first-time founders in Turkey open independently; hiring a good chef or manager covers most of the "system" assurance a franchise offers.
| Independent | Franchise | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry fee | 0 | ₺1.5m |
| Opening ramp | 12 months | 6-7 months |
| Royalty + marketing | 0 | 8% of sales |
| Supply cost | negotiated | mandated, +5-10% |
| Year-2 EBITDA margin | ~18-22% | ~12-16% |
| Payback | 24-30 months | 26-34 months |
The franchise's fast ramp shrinks the first-year cash trough; the royalty leaves profit every year. Over five years the independent model usually earns more, but carries more risk.
Growth based only on entry fees, refusal to share real unit data, no revenue reporting system, fit-out twice as expensive through the mandatory contractor, social media accounts owned by the brand, clauses banning transfer.
No industry experience, sufficient budget and a need for speed: franchise. Margin, differentiation, long-term value and the ability to build an experienced team: independent. Model the same venue in FIZIB as two feasibilities (franchise on/off); let the numbers decide.
Answer the questions; get your 36-month projection and investor deck.
Start free